Donate Now  |  Take Action  |  Sign Up
 

About Us
 
Our Work
 
Testimony at the UN
 
Articles
 
Reports
 
Statements & Letters
 
Issues in Focus
 
Media Center
 
Take Action
 
Sign Up
 
Contact Us
 
Internships
 
Donate
 
En français
 
En español
 
       בעברית
 



 

 

  

Reports



EVALUATION OF CANDIDATES FOR 2014-2016
MEMBERSHIP ON THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

Presented at United Nations Headquarters, New York, Nov. 4, 2013

Click here for full report PDF

Executive Summary

This report evaluates the 17 countries that have formally submitted candidacies for the November 12, 2013 election of 14 new members to the UN Human Rights Council. To evaluate qualifications we applied the membership criteria established by UNGA Resolution 60/251. In particular, we examined (a) each candidate’s record of domestic human rights protection; and (b) its UN voting record.The report finds as follows:

Not Qualified
7 candidates have poor records and fail to qualify:
Algeria, China, Cuba, Jordan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam

Questionable
6 candidates have problematic human rights and/or UN voting records:
Maldives, Morocco, Namibia, South Africa, South Sudan, Uruguay

Qualified
Only 4 out of the 17 candidate countries are qualified to be Council members:
France, Macedonia, Mexico, UK

The absence of competition in both the Western and Eastern European groups are unfortunate, and undermine the premise and rationale for holding elections. Nevertheless, this report reminds UN member states that they have the right to refrain from voting for a non-qualified candidate such as Russia, even though it is running on a closed slate. Instead, as detailed in the report, during the ballot they can actually defeat such candidacies, and instead free up the process for qualified alternatives to come forward. We note several alternative candidacies for the relevant regional groups, who have better human rights and U.N. voting records:

Qualified Alternative Candidates
Africa: Cape Verde, Ghana, Zambia
Asia: Mongolia and East Timor
Eastern Europe: Hungary, Slovenia, Lithuania

In regard to candidate countries deemed Questionable, they should, at a minimum, be asked to commit to redress the shortcomings identified in this report.

Click here for full report PDF