Donate Now  |  Take Action  |  Sign Up
 

About Us
 
Our Work
 
UN Watch Briefing
 
Testimony at the UN
 
Articles
 
Reports
 
Statements & Letters
 
Issues in Focus
 
Media Center
 
Take Action
 
Sign Up
 
Contact Us
 
Internships
 
Donate
 
En français
 
En español
 
       בעברית
 



 

 

  

Testimony at the UN

Massacre in Syria, UN Debate on Israel

UN Watch Statement
UN Human Rights Council
Agenda Item 7: “Human rights situation in Palestine
and other occupied Arab territories”
Delivered by Hillel Neuer, June 14

Mr. President,

History will record that the highest human rights body of the United Nations met today for no objective reason. Nothing in recent events, nothing in logic, nothing in human rights justifies today’s debate.

Our meeting is automatic—the consequence of a decision adopted four years ago, shortly after this council was created, to keep a permanent agenda item on one country only: Israel.

History will record that at a time when citizens across the Middle East were being attacked by their own government—by rifles, tanks, and helicopters—the UN focused its scarce time and attention on a country in that region where this is not happening; the only country in the region which, despite its flaws, respects the right to peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion; the only country in the region with free elections, an independent judiciary, and the equal treatment of women; the only country where gays are not persecuted, arrested or stoned to death, but, on the contrary, march in their own annual parade, as they did in Tel Aviv three days ago.

Mr. President, that is why the logic of this agenda item represents the opposite of human rights, and why it embodies the pathologies that so discredited this council’s predecessor.

Indeed, this item is so unjust, so biased, so selective, so politicized, and so contradictory to this council’s own principles of equality and universality, that it was condemned by the Secretary-General himself, Mr. Ban Ki-moon, on 20 June 2007, the day after its adoption.

And so we ask: In its recent 5-year review, despite everything happening in the Middle East, why did the Council decide to perpetuate this item, an act that will be finalized this week by the General Assembly?

Mr. President,

History will record that when citizens were being persecuted or massacred by their own governments—in Syria, Iran, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain and elsewhere—the UN chose to turn a blind eye to the victims, and instead endorsed the cynicism, hypocrisy and scapegoating of the perpetrators.

Thank you, Mr. President.





Read our recent editions:

  • Issue 485
  • Outspoken Israel critic said likely to replace Richard Falk as rights monitor -- Dictatorships Tried to Silence UN Watch's Hillel Neuer: 'He Should Not be Given The Floor'
  • Issue 484
  • Clash at UN: China Fails to Stop UN Watch Testimony by Daughter of Jailed Democracy Leader Wang Bingzhang
  • Issue 482
  • Clash at UN Assembly: Venezuela Objects as Aunt of Jailed Opposition Leader Calls for Urgent Human Rights Council Debate
  • Issue 481
  • The tragic farce of the UN Human Rights Council
  • Issue 480
  • Richard Falk’s wife is top nominee for a post on the Human Rights Council
  • Issue 479
  • Blind Chinese Dissident Wins Courage Award at UN Watch's Geneva Summit for Human Rights